Eviction cases in New York City often culminate in the issuance and execution of a warrant of eviction, which authorizes a New York City Marshal to remove a tenant from the premises. While nonpayment proceedings and holdover proceedings involve different substantive legal requirements, the process of obtaining and executing a warrant is generally similar once the landlord obtains a judgment of possession.
This guide explains the practical workflow for obtaining a warrant of eviction in NYC Housing Court, common delays landlords encounter, and misconceptions about the eviction process.
For an overview of Housing Court procedure, see: How NYC Landlord-Tenant Proceedings Work: A Practical Guide for Nonpayment and Holdover Cases.
Landlords should also be aware that New York’s Good Cause Eviction Law may affect the viability of certain holdover proceedings and lease nonrenewals. See: Understanding New York’s Good Cause Eviction Law.
A warrant of eviction is a court-issued directive authorizing a New York City Marshal to remove occupants from the premises and restore possession to the landlord. A landlord cannot lawfully evict a tenant without:
The chart below outlines the typical paths to obtaining and executing an eviction warrant in NYC Housing Court:

A warrant of eviction cannot be issued unless the landlord first obtains a judgment of possession. The judgment may be obtained through:
A stipulation of settlement;
Tenant default;
Summary judgment or motion practice; or
Trial.
In practice, many NYC landlord-tenant cases resolve through stipulations of settlement. Common reasons tenants agree to a final judgment of possession include:
In nonpayment proceedings, stipulations frequently provide that the landlord may seek issuance of a warrant if the tenant defaults under a payment schedule.
Once the landlord is entitled to seek issuance of the warrant, the landlord or counsel typically prepares the warrant paperwork for the Marshal. The required documents vary depending on how the judgment was obtained and the practices of the assigned court part, but commonly include:
Warrant requisition form;
Affidavit of non-military service (if Tenant defaulted); and
Default affidavit (if Tenant defaulted).
The warrant itself is generally filed through the NYC Marshal, not directly by the landlord or attorney.
After submission, the Housing Court reviews the request and, if approved, issues the warrant of eviction.
Processing times vary dramatically by borough, court part, staffing conditions, and case posture. In some Bronx and Brooklyn parts, issuance delays can extend for weeks and even months. A common misconception is that the warrant issues automatically upon entry of judgment. That is incorrect. The judgment merely authorizes the landlord to request issuance of the warrant.
After the warrant is issued, the Marshal serves a 14-day notice of eviction pursuant to RPAPL § 749. The notice advises the tenant of the earliest date on which the eviction may occur.
Even after issuance of the warrant, the Marshal cannot execute the eviction until:
The 14-day notice period expires; and
Any court-imposed stay or restriction expires.
Once the notice period expires, the Marshal coordinates the eviction with the landlord or property manager. On the scheduled date, the landlord should ensure:
Access to the premises;
Building personnel are available if needed; and
Compliance with all marshal instructions.
After execution, possession is restored to the landlord.
The most common cause of eviction delay is the tenant’s filing of an Order to Show Cause (“OSC”). An OSC is an emergency application requesting the court to stay or postpone the eviction.
Common grounds include:
Claim of payment;
Request for additional time;
Alleged improper notice;
Pending rental assistance applications;
Medical hardship; or
Alleged defective conditions.
Housing Court judges frequently grant temporary stays to review the tenant’s claims. Repeated OSC applications with weak grounds are less likely to receive extended stays, but outcomes vary significantly by judge and circumstances.
Judgments or stipulations often contain an Earliest Execution Date (“EED”), which delays enforcement of the warrant until a specified date. Even if the warrant is issued before that date, the Marshal cannot execute the eviction until the stay expires.
In nonpayment proceedings, partial or full payment after judgment may substantially affect the eviction timeline.
For example:
Full payment of all rent arrears may resolve the proceeding entirely, depending on the stipulation or court order;
Partial payment may require recalculation of the arrears;
Acceptance of post-judgment payments without proper documentation can create disputes regarding waiver or reinstatement rights.
Landlords should document all payments carefully and coordinate with counsel before accepting substantial post-judgment payments.
For more on procedural mistakes that can derail Housing Court cases, see: Common Pitfalls in NYC Eviction Proceedings for Landlords.
Incorrect.
A judgment of possession only authorizes the landlord to request issuance of the warrant. Court processing delays and document deficiencies frequently delay issuance.
Incorrect.
Before eviction can occur:
The warrant must be issued;
The Marshal must serve a 14-day notice of eviction; and
Any stays or OSCs must be resolved.
Not necessarily.
The tenant may still seek emergency court relief through an OSC, and Housing Court judges often issue temporary stays pending review. As a result, eviction scheduling in NYC can remain unpredictable even after the Marshal’s notice is served.
In NYC Housing Court practice, the Marshal generally files or presents the warrant paperwork to the court after receiving the required documents from the landlord or attorney.
Obtaining and executing a warrant of eviction in NYC is often more complicated and time-consuming than landlords expect. Even after securing a judgment of possession, delays caused by court processing, OSC applications, payment disputes, or procedural defects may significantly postpone enforcement.
Landlords, property managers, and attorneys should ensure that warrant paperwork is accurate, promptly submitted, and coordinated carefully with the assigned Marshal to avoid unnecessary delays.